PLANT BIOLOGY
ANIMAL BIOLOGY
SUBSCRIPTION
E-SUBSCRIPTION
 
MAP
MAIN PAGE

 

 

 

 

doi: 10.15389/agrobiology.2023.6.1021eng

UDC: 636.5:636.085

 

GLUCOSINOLATES IN RAPE AND CAMELINA: COMPOSITION, CONCENTRATIONS, TOXICITY AND ANTI-NUTRITIVE EFFECTS IN POULTRY, METHODS OF NEUTRALIZATION — A MINI-REVIEW

T.A. Egorova 

Federal Scientific Center All-Russian Research and Technological Institute of Poultry, 10, ul. Ptitsegradskaya, Sergiev Posad, Moscow Province, 141311 Russia, e-mail eta164@yandex.ru (✉ corresponding author)

ORCID:
Egorova T.A. orcid.org/0000-0002-5102-2248

Final revision received December 10, 2022
Accepted February 16, 2023

During the last decades animal nutrition and feed production in the World encounter the increasingly important problem of the deficit of feed-grade protein especially urgent for the regions (including Russian Federation) where the soybeans (considered an “ideal” protein source in feeds for all animal and poultry species) cannot be effectively cultivated. To solve this problem, decrease feeding costs and dependence on the imported soybeans the local vegetable protein sources are increasingly used including Brassicaceae oil crops rape (Brassica napus L.) and camelina (Camelina sativa L.) which are highly tolerant to the conditions of cultivation. Though cakes and meals of these crops are rich in protein they contain certain anti-nutritive factors including glycosides called glucosinolates (GLs), a vast group of protective secondary plant metabolites, alkyl-aldoxime O-sulphates containing the residue of β-D-thioglucopyranoside bonded to the hydroximine carbon in cis-position to the sulphate group. At present over 120 natural GLs are identified (B.A. Halkier and J. Gershenzon, 2006). The toxic and anti-nutritive effects of the GLs in rapeseed and methods for their neutralization are relatively well studied; however, the effects of GLs in camelina are still understudied (due to its relatively short history of large-scale cultivation) and hence the data obtained on rape should be used for the assessment of possible effects of camelina. The detrimental biological effects of the GLs on poultry, their mechanisms and methods of neutralization are reviewed herein. The GLs per se are non-toxic and their protective role in the plants is related to the endogenous plant enzymes β-thioglucosidases (myrosinases): GLs and myrosinases normally (in an intact plant) localized in different tissues contact after the damage of the plant (e.g. by insects or other herbivores) resulting in the enzymatic hydrolysis of the GLs and transformation of their aglycone residues into the potentially toxic products: isothiocyanates, thiocyanates, oxazolydine-thiones, nitriles, epithionitriles (D.J. Kliebenstein et al., 2005). Similar processes could be also induced by the enzymes of intestinal microbiota in poultry. Main toxic effect of almost all these products is goitrogenicity involving disturbance of the synthesis and secretion of thyroid hormones into the bloodstream and (in cases of heavier exposure) hypertrophy of the thyroid gland and formation of the goiter. In sub-toxic doses these GL metabolites can hamper the growth in young poultry, decrease egg production and quality in adult hens, induce “fishy taint” of the eggs. Since 1960s the rape has been intensively selected for decreased GL content and a wide range of low-GL cultivars are now present in the market; similar work with the camelina is still at its start. Concentrations of the GLs in cakes and meals of these crops can be decreased by thermal treatment (at ca. 100 °С), soaking in water, treatments with solutions of alkali or copper sulphate, solid-phase microbial fermentation, micronization, extrusion, etc. (M.K. Tripathi and A.S. Mishra, 2007). Maximal permissible level of the GLs in diets for poultry is apparently 5-6 mM/kg, corresponding to dietary levels of the products of the native rape ca. 10 %, low-GL rape varieties 15-20 %, camelina products 5-10 %. The studies on the toxic and anti-nutritive effects of rape and especially camelina are necessary for the practice of poultry nutrition and important for further genetic improvement of these crops.
 
Keywords: poultry, nutrition, rape, camelina, cakes, meals, glucosinolates, goitrogenicity, selection.

 

REFERENCES

  1. Egorova T.A., Lenkova T.N. Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) and its prospective useage in poultry diet (review). Sel'skokhozyaistvennaya biologiya [Agricultural Biology], 2015, 50(2): 172-182 CrossRef
  2. Ghidoli M., Ponzoni E., Araniti F., Miglio D., Pilu R. Genetic improvement of Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz: opportunities and challenges. Plants (Basel), 2023, 12(3): 570 CrossRef
  3. Fahey J.W., Zalcman A.T., Talalay P. The chemical diversity and distribution of glucosinolates and isothiocyanates among plants. Phytochemistry, 2001, 56(1): 5-51 CrossRef
  4. Halkier B.A., Gershenzon J. Biology and biochemistry of glucosinolates. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 2006, 57(1): 303-333 CrossRef
  5. Rask L., Andreasson E., Ekbom B., Eriksson S., Pontoppidan B., Meijer J. Myrosinase: gene family evolution and herbivore defense in Brassicaceae. Plant Molecular Biology, 2000, 42(1): 93-113 CrossRef
  6. Kliebenstein D.J., Kroymann J., Mitchell-Olds T. The glucosinolate-myrosinase system in an ecological and evolutionary context. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 2005, 8(3): 264-271 CrossRef
  7. Song L., Morrison J.J., Botting N.P., Thornalley P.J. Analysis of glucosinolates, isothiocyanates, and amine degradation products in vegetable extracts and blood plasma by LC-MS/MS. Analytical Biochemistry, 2005, 347(2): 234-243 CrossRef
  8. Miklavčič Višnjevec A., Tamayo Tenorio A., Steenkjær Hastrup A.C., Hansen N., Peeters K., Schwarzkopf M. Glucosinolates and isothiocyantes in processed rapeseed determined by HPLC-DAD-qTOF. Plants (Basel), 2021, 10(11): 2548 CrossRef
  9. EFSA. Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain on a request from the European Commission on glucosinolates as undesirable substances in animal feed. EFSA Journal, 2008, (590): 1-76.
  10. Brown P.D., Morra M.J. Hydrolysis products of glucosinolates in Brassica napus tissues as inhibitors of seed germination. Plant and Soil, 1996, 181(2): 307-316 CrossRef
  11. Vierheilig H., Bennett R., Kiddle G., Kaldorf M., Ludwig-Müller J. Differences in glucosinolate patterns and arbuscular mycorrhizal status of glucosinolate-containing plant species. New Phytologist, 2000, 146(2): 343-352 CrossRef
  12. Morra M.J., Kirkegaard J.A. Isothiocyanate release from soil-incorporated Brassica tissues. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2002, 34(11): 1683-1690 CrossRef
  13. Okada K., Matsuzaki M., Yasumoto S. Effect of the preceding crops in rice-based double-cropping systems including rapeseed and sunflower. Japan Journal of Crop Science, 2008, 77(extra issue 1): 96-97.
  14. Schuster A., Friedt W. Glucosinolate content and composition as parameters of quality of Camelina seed. Industrial Crops and Products, 1998, 7(2-3): 297-302 CrossRef
  15. Tripathi M.K., Mishra A.S. Glucosinolates in animal nutrition: A review. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2007, 132(1-2): 1-27 CrossRef
  16. Lardy G.P., Kerley M.S. Effect of increasing the dietary level of rapeseed meal on intake by growing beef steers. Journal of Animal Science, 1994, 72(8): 1936-1942 CrossRef
  17. Russo R., Reggiani R. Glucosinolates and sinapine in Camelina meal. Food and Nutrition Sciences, 2017, 8(12): 1063-1073 CrossRef
  18. Burel C., Boujard T., Kaushik S.J., Boeuf G., Mol K.A., van der Geyten G.S., Darras V.M., Kuhn E.R., Pradet-Balade B., Querat B., Quinsac A., Krouti M., Ribaillier D. Effects of rapeseed meal glucosinolates on thyroid metabolism and feed utilization in rainbow trout. General and Comparative Endocrinology, 2001, 124(3): 343-358 CrossRef<
  19. Martland M.F., Butler E.J., Fenwick G.R. Rapeseed induced liver haemorrhage reticulolysis and biochemical changes in laying hens: the effects of feeding high and low glucosinolate meals. Research in Veterinary Science, 1984, 36(3): 298-309.
  20. Umemura T., Yamashiro S., Bhatnagar M.K., Moody D.L., Slinger S.J. Liver fibrosis of the turkey on rapeseed products. Research in Veterinary Science, 1977, 23(2): 139-145.
  21. Mawson R., Heaney R.K., Zdunczyk Z., Kozlowska H. Rapeseed meal-glucosinolates and their antinutritional effects. Part 6. Taint in end-products. Nahrung, 1995, 39(1): 21-31 CrossRef
  22. March B.E., MacMillan C. Trimethylamine production in the caeca and small intestine as a cause of fishy taints in eggs. Poultry Science, 1979, 58(1): 93-98 CrossRef
  23. Goh Y.K., Robblee A.R., Clandinin D.R. Influence of glucosinolates and free oxazolidinethione in a laying hen diet containing a constant amount of sinapine on the trimethylamine content and fishy odor of eggs from brown-shelled egg layers. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 1983, 63(3): 671-676 CrossRef
  24. Honkatukia M., Reese K., Preisinger R., Tuiskula-Haavisto M., Weigend S., Roito J., Mäki-Tanila A., Vilkki J. Fishy taint in chicken eggs is associated with a substitution within a conserved motif of the FMO3 gene. Genomics, 2005, 86(2): 225-232 CrossRef
  25. Kretzschmar K., Reese K., Honkatukia M., Eding H., Preisinger R., Karl H., Dänicke S., Weigend S. Effect of flavin containing monooxygenase (FMO3) genotype on trimethylamine (TMA) content in the chicken egg yolk. Archiv für Geflügelkunde, 2007, 71(6): 200-206.
  26. Ward A.K., Classen H.L., Buchanan F.C. Fishy-egg tainting is recessively inherited when brown-shelled layers are fed canola meal. Poultry Science, 2009, 88(4): 714-721 CrossRef
  27. Oryschak M.A., Smit M.N., Beltranena E. Brassica napus and Brassica juncea extruded-expelled cake and solvent-extracted meal as feedstuffs for laying hens: Lay performance, egg quality, and nutrient digestibility. Poultry Science, 2020, 99(1): 350-363 CrossRef
  28. Zhu L.P., Wang J.P., Ding X.M., Bai S.P., Zeng Q.F., Su Z.W., Xuan Y., Applegate T.J., Zhang K.Y. The effects of varieties and levels of rapeseed expeller cake on egg production performance, egg quality, nutrient digestibility, and duodenum morphology in laying hens. Poultry Science, 2019, 98(10): 4942-4953 CrossRef
  29. Tan Q., Wang J.P., Zeng Q.F., Ding X.M., Bai S.P., Peng H.W., Xuan Y., Zhang K.Y. Effects of rapeseed meal on laying performance and egg quality in laying ducks. Poultry Science, 2022, 101(3): 101678 CrossRef
  30. Bell J.M., Shires A. Comparison and digestibility by pigs of hull fractions from rapeseed cultivars with yellow or brown seed coats. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 1982, 62(2): 557-565 CrossRef
  31. Kloss P., Jeffrey E., Wallig M., Tumbleson M., Parsons C., Johnson L., Reuber M. Efficacy of feeding glucosinolate-extracted crambe meal to broiler chicks. Poultry Science, 1994, 73(10): 1542-1551 CrossRef
  32. Mawson R., Heaney R.K., Zdunczyk Z., Kozlowska H. Rapeseed meal glucosinolates and their antinutritional effects. Part 4. Goitrogenicity and internal organs abnormalities in animals. Nahrung, 1994, 38(2): 178-191 CrossRef
  33. Yadav S., Teng P.Y., Singh A.K., Choi J., Kim W.K. Influence of Brassica spp. rapeseed and canola meal, and supplementation of bioactive compound (AITC) on growth performance, intestinal permeability, oocyst shedding, lesion score, histomorphology, and gene expression of broilers challenged with E. maxima. Poultry Science, 2022, 101(2): 101583 CrossRef
  34. Inglis G.D., Wright B.D., Sheppard S.A., Abbott D.W., Oryschak M.A., Montina T. Expeller-pressed canola (Brassica napus) meal modulates the structure and function of the cecal microbiota, and alters the metabolome of the pancreas, liver, and breast muscle of broiler chickens. Animals (Basel), 2021, 11(2): 577 CrossRef
  35. Adewole D.I., Rogiewicz A., Dyck B., Slominski B.A. Effects of canola meal source on the standardized ileal digestible amino acids and apparent metabolizable energy contents for broiler chickens. Poultry Science, 2017, 96(12): 4298-4306 CrossRef
  36. Recoules E., Lessire M., Labas V., Duclos M.J., Combes-Soia L., Lardic L., Peyronnet C., Quinsac A., Narcy A., Réhault-Godbert S. Digestion dynamics in broilers fed rapeseed meal. Scientific Reports, 2019, 9(1): 3052 CrossRef
  37. Ryhänen E.-L., Perttilä S., Tupasela T., Valaja J., Eriksson C., Larkka K. Effect of Camelina sativa expeller cake on performance and meat quality of broilers. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2007, 87(8): 1489-1494 CrossRef
  38. Hajiazizi F., Sadeghi A., Karimi A. The effects of dietary inclusion of Camelina sativa on performance and ascites incidence in broilers subjected to cold exposure. Veterinary Medicine and Science, 2023, 9(4): 1711-1725 CrossRef
  39. Oryschak M.A., Christianson C.B., Beltranena E. Camelina sativa cake for broiler chickens: effects of increasing dietary inclusion on clinical signs of toxicity, feed disappearance, and nutrient digestibility. Translational Animal Science, 2020, 4(2): txaa029 CrossRef
  40. Singh Y., Cullere M., Tůmová E., Dalle Zotte A. Camelina sativa as a sustainable and feasible feedstuff for broiler poultry species: A review. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 2023, 68(7): 277-295 CrossRef
  41. Juodka R., Nainienė R., Juškienė V., Juška R., Leikus R., Kadžienė G., Stankevičienė D. Camelina (Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz) as feedstuffs in meat type poultry diet: a source of protein and n-3 fatty acids. Animals (Basel), 2022, 12(3): 295 CrossRef
  42. Orczewska-Dudek S., Pietras M. The effect of dietary Camelina sativa oil or cake in the diets of broiler chickens on growth performance, fatty acid profile, and sensory quality of meat. Animals (Basel), 2019, 9(10): 734 CrossRef
  43. Lolli S., Grilli G, Ferrari L., Battelli G., Pozzo S., Galasso I., Russo R., Brasca M., Reggian  R., Ferrante V. Effect of different percentage of Camelina sativa cake in laying hens diet: performance, welfare, and eggshell quality. Animals (Basel), 2020, 10(8): 1396 CrossRef
  44. Kondra Z., Stefansson B. Inheritance of the major glucosinolates of rapeseed (Brassica napus) meal. Canadian J. Plant. Sci., 1970, 50(6): 643-647 CrossRef
  45. Kliebenstein D.J., Gershenzon J., Mitchell-Olds T. Comparative quantitative trait loci mapping of aliphatic, indolic and benzylic glucosinolate production in Arabidopsis thaliana leaves and seeds. Genetics, 2001, 159(1): 359-370 CrossRef
  46. Liu S., Huang H., Yi X., Zhang Y., Yang Q., Zhang C., Fan C., Zhou Y. Dissection of genetic architecture for glucosinolate accumulations in leaves and seeds of Brassica napus by genome-wide association study. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 2020, 18(6): 1472-1484 CrossRef
  47. Nour-Eldin H.H., Halkier B.A. Piecing together the transport pathway of aliphatic glucosinolates. Phytochemistry Reviews, 2009, 8(1): 53-67 CrossRef
  48. Nour-Eldin H.H., Andersen T.G., Burow M., Madsen S.R., Jørgensen M.E., Olsen C.E., Dreyer I., Hedrich R., Geiger D., Halkier B.A. NRT/PTR transporters are essential for translocation of glucosinolate defense compounds to seeds. Nature, 2012, 488(7412): 531-534 CrossRef
  49. Nour-Eldin H.H., Madsen S.R., Engelen S., Jørgensen M.E., Olsen C.E., Andersen J.S., Seynnaeve D., Verhoye T., Fulawka R., Denolf P., Halkier B.A. Reduction of antinutritional glucosinolates in Brassica oilseeds by mutation of genes encoding transporters. Nature Biotechnology, 2017, 35(4): 377-382 CrossRef
  50. Russo R., Galasso I., Reggiani R. Glucosinolate content among Camelina species. American Journal of Plant Sciences, 2014, 5(3): 294-298 CrossRef
  51. Kozlowska H.J., Nowak H., Nowak J. Characterisation of myrosinase in Polish varieties of rapeseed. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 1983, 34(11): 1171-1178 CrossRef
  52. Nega T., Woldes Y. Review on nutritional limitations and opportunities of using rapeseed meal and other rape seed by-products in animal feeding. Journal of Nutritional Health and Food Engineering, 2018, 8(1): 43-48 CrossRef
  53. So K.K.Y., Duncan R.W. Breeding Canola (Brassica napus L.) for protein in feed and food. Plants (Basel), 2021, 10(10): 2220 CrossRef
  54. Eklund M., Sauer N., Schöne F., Messerschmidt U., Rosenfelder P., Htoo J.K., Mosenthin R. Effect of processing of rapeseed under defined conditions in a pilot plant on chemical composition and standardized ileal amino acid digestibility in rapeseed meal for pigs. Journal of Animal Science, 2015, 93(6): 2813-2825 CrossRef
  55. Wiąz M., Mroczyk M., Józefiak D., Rutkowski A. Composition of rapeseed cakes and meals manufactured under different technological conditions. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences, 2005, 14(Suppl. 1): 507-510 CrossRef
  56. Wu Z., Liu J., Chen J., Pirzado S.A., Li Y., Cai H., Liu G. Effects of fermentation on standardized ileal digestibility of amino acids and apparent metabolizable energy in rapeseed meal fed to broiler chickens. Animals (Basel), 2020, 10(10): 1774 CrossRef
  57. Wu Z., Chen J., Pirzado S.A., Haile T.H., Cai H., Liu G. The effect of fermented and raw rapeseed meal on the growth performance, immune status and intestinal morphology of broiler chickens. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition (Berlin), 2022, 106(2): 296-307 CrossRef
  58. Taheri M., Dastar B., Ashayerizadeh O., Mirshekar R. The effect of fermented rapeseed meal on production performance, egg quality and hatchability in broiler breeders after peak production. British Poultry Science, 2023, 64(2): 259-267 CrossRef
  59. Elbaz A.M., El-Sheikh S.E., Abdel-Maksoud A. Growth performance, nutrient digestibility, antioxidant state, ileal histomorphometry, and cecal ecology of broilers fed on fermented canola meal with and without exogenous enzymes. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 2023, 55(1): 46 CrossRef
  60. Zając M., Kiczorowska B., Samolińska W., Klebaniuk R. Inclusion of camelina, flax, and sunflower seeds in the diets for broiler chickens: apparent digestibility of nutrients, growth performance, health status, and carcass and meat quality traits. Animals (Basel), 2020, 10(2): 321 CrossRef
  61. Zając M., Kiczorowska B., Samolińska W., Kowalczyk-Pecka D., Andrejko D., Kiczorowski P. Effect of inclusion of micronized camelina, sunflower, and flax seeds in the broiler chicken diet on performance productivity, nutrient utilization, and intestinal microbial populations. Poultry Science, 2021, 100(7): 101118 CrossRef
  62. Pirgozliev V.R., Whiting I.M., Mansbridge S.C., Rose S.P. Sunflower and rapeseed meal as alternative feed materials to soybean meal for sustainable egg production, using aged laying hens. British Poultry Science, 2023, 64(5): 634-640 CrossRef
  63. Cullere M., Singh Y., Pellattiero E., Berzuini S., Galasso I., Clemente C., Dalle Zotte A. Effect of the dietary inclusion of Camelina sativa cake into quail diet on live performance, carcass traits, and meat quality. Poultry Science, 2023, 102(6): 102650 CrossRef
  64. Traka M.H. Health benefits of glucosinolates. In: Advances in botanical research. S. Kopriva (ed.). Academic Press, 2016, 80(Chpt. 9): 247-279 CrossRef
  65. Akram M., Jabeen F., Riaz M., Said Khan F., Okushanova E., Imran M., Shariati M.A., Riaz T., Egbuna Ch., Ezeofor N.J. Health benefits of glucosinolate isolated from cruciferous and other vegetables. In: Preparation of phytopharmaceuticals for the management of disorders. Ch. Egbuna, A.P. Mishra, M.R. Goyal (eds.). Academic Press, 2021, Chpt. 19: 361-371 CrossRef

 

back

 


CONTENTS

 

 

Full article PDF (Rus)

Full article PDF (Eng)