PLANT BIOLOGY
ANIMAL BIOLOGY
SUBSCRIPTION
E-SUBSCRIPTION
 
MAP
MAIN PAGE

 

 

 

 

doi: 10.15389/agrobiology.2024.5.995eng

UDC: 633.52:581.1

Acknowledgements:
Сarried out within the framework of the state assignment of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (No. 122042600086-7)

 

CULTIVATION OF FLAX (Linum L.) SPROUTS AND THEIR RESPONSE TO THE CADMIUM IONS’ EFFECT in vitro: THE STRESS REACTION LEVEL AND POLYPHENOLS ACCUMULATION

E.A. Goncharuk , T.L. Nechayeva, A.V. Kartashov, N.V. Zagoskina

Timiryazev Institute of Plant Physiology RAS, 35, Botanicheskaya ul., Moscow, 127276 Russia, e-mail
goncharuk.ewgenia@yandex.ru (✉ corresponding author), NechaevaTatyana.07@yandex.ru, botanius@yandex.ru, nzagoskina@mail.ru

ORCID:
Goncharuk E.A. orcid.org/0000-0002-9280-9450
Kartashov A.V. orcid.org/0000-0001-8556-8719
Nechayeva T.L. orcid.org/0000-0003-3341-4763
Zagoskina N.V. orcid.org/0000-0002-1457-9450

Final revision received August 23, 2024
Accepted September 16, 2024

In the species diversity of the genus Linum L., represented by more than 200 species, the only cultivated one is Linum usitatissimum L. The most popular flax products (or flax cultivation products) include high-strength flax fiber, its processed products — cake and chaff, as well as highly nutritious flaxseed oil as a source of short-chain polyunsaturated omega-3 and omega-6 fatty acids, linolenic acid, vitamins A, B, D and E, fiber and protein. High decorativeness of flax in landscapes are also noted. Today, the ecological situation in flax-growing regions is unfavorable, including due to environmental pollution with heavy metals, in particular cadmium (Cd), a highly toxic and mobile element of the first hazard class in the soil solution. Its priming action inhibits physiologically important growth processes, increases the generation of active oxygen forms, and initiates the oxidation of proteins and lipids. All this disrupts the efficient functioning and activity of the antioxidant system in plants, including its non-enzymatic component, represented by low-molecular antioxidants, including polyphenols. The latter are capable of interacting with active forms of oxygen, the amount of which increases under the influence of Cd. In this work, the stress response to the action of this representative of heavy metals in in vitro seedlings of three varieties of flax as a model biotechnological system was assessed for the first time, and their ability to accumulate polyphenols, effective bioantioxidants and the main components of the phenolic complex, was studied. A comparison of in vitro responses of seedlings to the action of Cd was carried out when assessing their morphophysiological characteristics, the level of lipid peroxidation (LPO) and the content of phenolic compounds, including phenylpropanoids and flavonoids. The objects of the study were in vitro sterile seedlings of fibre flax (variety Lenok), oil flax (variety Sanlin) (L. usitatissimum), and ornamental flax (large-flowered flax, variety Red) (L. grandiflorum Desf.). To obtain them, sequential sterilization of seeds was carried out, which were then placed on sucrose-containing (2 %) hormone-free agar nutrient media Murashige-Skoog (fibre flax and oil flax) and Gamborg B5 (large-flowered flax). During the experiment, 14-day-old flax seedlings were exposed to exogenous action of 75 μM aqueous solution of cadmium nitrate (experimental treatment) or water (control treatment) by introducing into the root zone. After 7-day exposure, morphometric parameters of seedlings (length of hypocotyl and main root) and their water content were analyzed. Biochemical determinations were carried out in plant material fixed with liquid nitrogen. The Cd content was analyzed by atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Phenolic compounds were extracted with 96% ethanol, and the content of the sum of phenolic compounds, phenylpropanoids, and flavonoids was determined spectrophotometrically. The LPO level was assessed by the reaction with thiobarbituric acid. It was found that in vitro seedlings of three flax varieties differed in physiological and biochemical parameters, which determines their response to the action of Cd. Already in the early stages of ontogenesis in vitro, species specificity was manifested in the formation of the root system, the formation of LPO reaction products, the accumulation of phenolic compounds and the absorption of the heavy metal. The highest Cd content was found in in vitro flax seedlings, a more efficient Cd accumulator compared to oil flax and large-flowered flax. It exceeded this indicator for oil flax and large-flowered flax by 20.2 and 23.6 %, respectively (р ≤ 0.05). The LPO level decreased only in oil flax and large-flowered flax by 24.2 and 34.2 %, р ≤ 0.05, respectively, compared to the control, which indicates activation of their defense systems in response to the pollutant. An increase in the total content of phenolic compounds, as well as their various classes (phenylpropanoids and flavonoids) in response to the action of Cd occurred only in oil flax (by 14 %, 70 % and 49 %, respectively, р ≤ 0.05) vs. the control, which indicates the process of activation of protective systems. All the data obtained demonstrate different responses in vitro of seedlings of the three flax varieties to the action of Cd, which are due to their species specificity. Under these conditions, a more pronounced response at the level of phenolic metabolism is characteristic of oil flax, which was distinguished by a high ability to form these secondary compounds and activation of the functioning of the antioxidant system relative to two other representatives of the genus Linum.

Keywords: in vitro sprouts, cadmium, morphology, lipid peroxidation, polyphenols, Linum usitatissimum L.

 

REFERENCES

  1. Rogers C.M. The systematics of Linum sect. Linopsis (Linaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution, 1982, 140(2-3): 225-334 CrossRef
  2. Svetlova A.A. Novosti sistematiki vysshikh rasteniy, 2010, 41: 99-65 CrossRef (in Russ.).
  3. Ramesh M.J.P.I.M.S. Flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) fibre reinforced polymer composite materials: A review on preparation, properties and prospects. Progress in Materials Science, 2019, 102: 109-166 CrossRef
  4. Pisupati A., Willaert L., Goethals F., Uyttendaele W., Park C.H. Variety and growing condition effect on the yield and tensile strength of flax fibers. Industrial Crops and Products, 2021, 170: 113736 CrossRef
  5. Yang J., Wen C., Duan Y., Deng Q., Peng D., Zhang H., Ma H. The composition, extraction, analysis, bioactivities, bioavailability and applications in food system of flaxseed (Linum usitatissimum L.) oil: A review. Trends in Food Science and Technology, 2021, 18: 252-260 CrossRef
  6. Page J., Amziane S., Gomina M., Djelal C., Audonnet F. Using linseed oil as flax fibre coating for fibre-reinforced cementitious composite. Industrial Crops and Products, 2021, 161: 113168 CrossRef
  7. Asad B., Khan T., Gul F.Z., Ullah M.A., Drouet S., Mikac S., Garros L., Ferrier M., Bose S., Munsch T., Tungmunnithum D., Lanoue A., Giglioli-Guivarc’h N., Hano C., Abbasi B.H. Scarlet flax Linum grandiflorum (L.) in vitro cultures as a new source of antioxidant and anti-inflammatory lignans. Molecules, 2021, 26 (15): 4511 CrossRef
  8. Villalvazo-Hernández A., Burgos-Hernández M., González D. Phylogenetic analysis and flower color evolution of the subfamily Linoideae (Linaceae). Plants, 2022, 11(12): 1579 CrossRef
  9. Goncharuk E.A., Zagoskina N.V. Heavy metals, their phytotoxicity, and the role of phenolic antioxidants in plant stress responses with focus on cadmium: review. Molecules, 2023, 28: 3921 CrossRef
  10. Yang G.L., Zheng M.M., Tan A.J., Liu Y.T., Feng D., Lv S. M. Research on the mechanisms of plant enrichment and detoxification of cadmium. Biology, 2021, 10(6): 544 CrossRef
  11. Andresen E., Küpper H. Cadmium toxicity in plants. Metal Ions in Life Sciences, 2013, 11: 395 CrossRef
  12. Ulrich A.E. Cadmium governance in Europe’s phosphate fertilizers: Not so fast? Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 650: 541-545 CrossRef
  13. Li B., Chen Z., Li Y., Yang W., Wang W. Visualization analysis of graphene and its composites for heavy metal wastewater applications. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2019, 26: 27752-27760 CrossRef
  14. Hui C.Y., Guo Y., Li H., Gao C.X., Yi J. Detection of environmental pollutant cadmium in water using a visual bacterial biosensor. Scientific reports, 2022, 12(1): 6898 CrossRef
  15. Zulfiqar U., Ayub A., Hussain S., Waraich E.A., El-Esawi M.A., Ishfaq M., Ahmad M., Ali M., Maqsood M.F. Cadmium toxicity in plants: Recent progress on morpho-physiological effects and remediation strategies. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 2022, 22: 212-269 CrossRef
  16. Ivanov A.A., Kosobryukhov A.A. Ecophysiology of plants under cadmium toxicity: Photosynthetic and physiological responses. In: Plant ecophysiology and adaptation under climate change: mechanisms and perspectives I. Springer: Singapore, 2020: 429-484 CrossRef
  17. Khaliq M.A., James B., Chen Y.H., Saqib H.S.A., Li H.H., Jayasuriya P., Guo W. Uptake, translocation, and accumulation of Cd and its interaction with mineral nutrients (Fe, Zn, Ni, Ca, Mg) in upland rice. Chemosphere, 2019, 215: 916-924 CrossRef
  18. Cuypers A., Vanbuel I., Iven V., Kunnen K., Vandionant S., Huybrechts M., Hendrix S. Cadmium-induced oxidative stress responses and acclimation in plants require fine-tuning of redox biology at subcellular level. Free Radical Biology and Medicine, 2023, 199: 81-96 CrossRef
  19. Zagoskina N.V., Zubova M.Y., Nechaeva T.L., Kazantseva V.V., Goncharuk E.A., Katanskaya V.M., Baranova E.N., Aksenova M.A. Polyphenols in plants: structure, biosynthesis, abiotic stress regulation, and practical applications (Review). International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2023, 24: 13874 CrossRef
  20. Wang Y., Lei Z., Ye R., Zhou W., Zhou Y., Zou Z., Li J., Yi L., Dai Z. Effects of cadmium on physiochemistry and bioactive substances of muskmelon (Cucumis melo L.). Molecules, 2022, 27: 2913 CrossRef
  21. Belšcak-Cvitanovic A., Durgo K., Hudek A., Bacun-Družina V., Komes D. Overview of polyphenols and their properties. In: Polyphenols: properties, recovery, and applications. C.M. Galanakis (ed.). Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2018: 3-44 CrossRef
  22. Nurzyńska-Wierdak R. Phenolic compounds from new natural sources — plant genotype and ontogenetic variation. Molecules, 2023, 28(4): 1731 CrossRef
  23. Rogge S.A., Neugart S., Schreiner M., Meyhöfer R. Phenolic compounds in different stages of ontogenesis in chrysanthemum — a potential for thrips-resistance characterisation. Horticulturae, 2024, 10(8): 822 CrossRef
  24. Moazzen A., Öztinen N., Ak-Sakalli E., Kosar M. Structure-antiradical activity relationships of 25 natural antioxidant phenolic compounds from different classes. Heliyon, 2022, 8: e10467 CrossRef
  25. Goncharova Yu.K., Goncharov S.V., Kharitonov E.M. Fotev Yu.V., Simonova V.V., Ochkas N.A. Plant antioxidants and their non-traditional sources (review). Sel'skokhozyaistvennaya biologiya [Agricultural Biology], 2024, 59(1): 39-53 CrossRef
  26. Cullis C.A.Fundamental insights into plant biology that might be offered by flax. In: Genetics and genomics of Linum, Springer, Cham., 2019: 261-263 CrossRef
  27. Goudenhooft C., Bourmaud A., Baley C. Flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) fibers for composite reinforcement: exploring the link between plant growth, cell walls development, and fiber properties. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2019, 10: 411 CrossRef
  28. Ramsay A., Fliniaux O., Quéro A., Molinié R., Demailly H., Hano C., Paetz C., Roscher A., Grand E., Kovensky J., Schneider B., Mesnard F. Kinetics of the incorporation of the main phenolic compounds into the lignan macromolecule during flaxseed development. Food Chem. 2017, 217: 1-8 CrossRef
  29. Garros L., Drouet S., Corbin C., Decourtil C., Fidel T., de Lacour J.L., Leclerc E.A., Renouard S., Tungmunnithum D., Doussot J., Abassi B.H., Maunit B., Laine E., Fliniaux O., Mesnard F., Hano C. Insight into the influence of cultivar type, cultivation year, and site on the lignans and related phenolic profiles, and the health-promoting antioxidant potential of flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) seeds. Molecules, 2018, 23: 2636 CrossRef
  30. Gai F., Janiak M.A., Sulewska K., Peiretti P.G., Karamac M. Phenolic compound profile and antioxidant capacity of flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) harvested at different growth stages. Molecules, 2023, 28: 1807 CrossRef
  31. Le T.N., Luong H.Q., Li H.P., Chiu C.H., Hsieh P.C. Broccoli (Brassica oleracea L. var. italica) sprouts as the potential food source for bioactive properties: a comprehensive study on in vitro disease models. Foods, 2019, 8(11): 532 CrossRef
  32. Sharde R., Tripathi M.K., Bhatt D., Tiwari S., Sharma M., Tomar Y., Tripathi N. Influence of plant growth regulators on in vitro morphogenesis in sprout culture of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Potato Research, 2024, 67: 399-420 CrossRef
  33. Goncharuk E.A., Zagoskina N.V. Subtropicheskoe i dekorativnoe sadovodstvo, 2018, 64: 144-149 (in Russ.).
  34. Rogozhin V.V., Rogozhina T.V. Praktikum po fiziologii i biokhimii rasteniy [Practical training in plant physiology and biochemistry]. St. Petersburg, 2013 (in Russ.).
  35. Shevyakova N.I., Il'Ina E.N., Stetsenko L.A., Kuznetsov V.V. Nickel accumulation in rape shoots (Brassica napus L.) increased by putrescine. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 2011, 13(4): 345-356 CrossRef
  36. Nikolaeva T.N., Lapshin P.V., Zagoskina N.V. Khimiya rastitel’nogo syr’ya, 2021, 2: 291-299 CrossRef (in Russ.).
  37. Goncharuck E.A., Kazantseva V.V., Zagoskina N.V. Effect of hypothermia on the composition of phenolics in buckwheat plants with different ploidy. Russian Journal of Plant Physiology, 2021, 68: 1227-1235 CrossRef
  38. Barriuso B., Astiasarán I., Ansorena D. A review of analytical methods measuring lipid oxidation status in foods: a challenging task. European Food Research and Technology, 2013, 236: 1-15 CrossRef
  39. Hodges D.M., DeLong J.M., Forney C.F., Prange R.K.Improving the thiobarbituric acid-reactive-substances assay for estimating lipid peroxidation in plant tissues containing anthocyanin and other interfering compounds. Planta, 1999, 207(4): 604-611 CrossRef
  40. Serebryakova T.I., Voronin N.S., Elenevskiy A.G., Batygina T.B., Shorina N.I., Savinykh N.P. Botanika s osnovami fitotsenologii: Anatomiya i morfologiya rasteniy[Botany with the basics of phytocoenology: Anatomy and morphology of plants]. Moscow, 2006 (in Russ.).
  41. Rogash A.R. L’novodstvo [Flax growing]. Moscow, 1967 (in Russ.).
  42. Litvinova I.I., Gladkov E.A. Introduction to cell culture used for obtaining fodder and decorative plants resistant to stress. Sel'skokhozyaistvennaya biologiya [Agricultural Biology], 2012, 4: 94-99 CrossRef
  43. Zhuchenko A.A. Adaptivnaya sistema selektsii rasteniy (ekologogeneticheskie osnovy)[Adaptive system of plant breeding (ecological and genetic foundations)]. Moscow, 2001 (in Russ.).
  44. Seregin I.V., Ivanov V.B. Fiziologiya rasteniy, 2001, 4: 606-630 (in Russ.).
  45. Hendrix S., Jozefczak M., Wójcik M., Deckers J., Vangronsveld J., Cuypers A. Glutathione: A key player in metal chelation, nutrient homeostasis, cell cycle regulation and the DNA damage response in cadmium-exposed Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 2020, 154: 498-507 CrossRef
  46. Brodersen C., McElrone A. Maintenance of xylem network transport capacity: a review of embolism repair in vascular plants. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2013, 4: 108 CrossRef
  47. Farjaminezhad R., Garoosi G. Prediction of the effect of chitosan on cell suspension culture of Azadirachta indica by response surface methodology. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC), 2021, 146(2): 323-337 CrossRef
  48. Saleem M.H., Ali S., Hussain S., Kamran M., Chattha M.S., Ahmad S., Ageel M., Rizwan M., Aliarba N.A., Alrahtani S., Abdel-Daim M.M. Flax (Linum usitatissimum L.): a potential candidate for phytoremediation? Biological and economical points of view. Plants, 2020, 9(4): 496 CrossRef
  49. Siromlya T.I., Zagurskaya Yu.V. Zhurnal obshchey biologii, 2021, 82(4): 283-296 CrossRef (in Russ.).
  50. Gorbunova V.A., Zubkova V.M., Belozubova N.Yu. Agrarnaya Rossiya, 2020, 3: 27-32 CrossRef (in Russ.).
  51. Hasanuzzaman M, Borhannuddin Bhuyan M.H.M., Zulfiqar F., Raza A., Mohsin S.M., Al Mahmud J. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant defense in plants under abiotic stress: revisiting the crucial role of a universal defense regulator. Antioxidants, 2020, 9(8): 681-733 CrossRef
  52. Novokhatin V.V., Shelomentseva T.V., Dragavtsev V.A.A novel integrative approach to study the dynamics of an increase in common spring wheat adaptivity and homeostaticity (on the example of breeding programs in the Northern Trans-Ural).  Sel'skokhozyaistvennaya biologiya [Agricultural Biology], 2022, 7(1): 81-97 CrossRef
  53. Huang H., Ullah F., Zhou D.X., Yi M., Zhao Y. Mechanisms of ROS regulation of plant development and stress responses. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2019, 10: 800 CrossRef
  54. Ali A.M.A., El-Nour M.E.M., Yagi S.M. Total phenolic and flavonoid contents and antioxidant activity of ginger (Zingiber officinale Rosc.) rhizome, callus and callus treated with some elicitors. Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, 2018, 16(2): 677-682 CrossRef
  55. Pradedova E.V., Isheeva O.D., Salyaev R.K. Fiziologiya rasteniy, 2011, 58(2): 177-185 (in Russ.).
  56. Goncharuk E.A., Saibel O.L., Zaitsev G.P., Zagoskina N.V. The elicitor effect of yeast extract on the accumulation of phenolic compounds in Linum grandiflorum cells cultured in vitro and their antiradical activity. Biology Bulletin, 2022, 49(6): 599-607 CrossRef

 

back

 


CONTENTS

 

Full article PDF (Eng)