PLANT BIOLOGY
ANIMAL BIOLOGY
SUBSCRIPTION
E-SUBSCRIPTION
 
MAP
MAIN PAGE

 

 

 

 

doi: 10.15389/agrobiology.2025.1.33eng

UDC: 633.863.2:631.52

Acknowledgements:
We appreciate kind favors of Dr W. Yan (Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada) for GGEbiplot application

 

VISUAL ANALYSIS OF ACCESSION BY TRAIT INTERACTION STRUCTURE OF AGRO-MORPHOLOGICAL TRAITS OF SAFFLOWER (Carthamus tinctorius L.) USING ACCESSION BY TRAIT (AT) BIPLOT MODEL

N. Sabaghnia, M. Janmohammadi, M. Nouraein

Department of Plant Production and Genetics, Agriculture College, University of Maragheh, Amirkabir Highway, Maragheh, 83111-55181 Iran, e-mail sabaghnia@maragheh.ac.ir (✉ corresponding author), jmohamad@alumni.ut.ac.ir, mojtabanouraein@maragheh.ac.ir

Sabaghnia N. orcid.org/0000-0001-9690-6525
Nouraein M. orcid.org/0000-0001-5124-7773
Janmohammadi M. orcid.org/0000-0002-6121-6791
Dzos E.A. orcid.org/0000-0002-2216-0094

Final revision received August 18, 2024
Accepted October 16, 2024  

Safflower an ancient oilseed crop is known as one of the oldest crops grown under semi-arid regions. In this research, 100 safflower accessions were investigated in an alpha lattice scheme (10×10) with two replicates across two growing years. Some morphologic, agronomic, yield components and seed yield performance were measured. The accession by trait (AT) biplot model was fitted to understand the structure of AT interaction and explained 60 and 66% of observed variation for the first and second year, respectively. A nonagon was constructed in the first year, and accession 28 exhibited the superior performance height of the first capitulum, seed yield and harvest index, while an octagon was formed in the second year, and accession 28 indicated the best performance for plant height, height of the first capitulum, seed yield and harvest index. The arrow-view plots indicated positive associations between seed yield and harvest index in the both years. The perfect accession biplot indicated that accessions 30, 33, 39, 45 and 93 from Iran, accessions 72 and 83 from Canada, accession 58 from USA, and accession 28 from unknown origin were identified as the best perfect accessions. The perfect trait biplot showed that plant height and stem diameter were more desirable and had highest representative and discrimination potential for screening safflower accessions. Regarding the results of both years, it can be concluded that accessions 7 (from Iran), 28 (unknown origin) and 33 (from Iran) had good potential for seed yield across two years, so they are good candidates for further analysis in order to cultivar release process for semi-arid regions.

Keywords: arrow-view, polygon-view, perfect accession, perfect trait.

 

REFERENCES

  1. Singh V., Nimbkar N. Safflower. In: Breeding oilseed crops for sustainable production. Academic Press, 2016, 149-167 CrossRef
  2. Majidi M.M., Zadhoush S. Molecular and morphological variation in a world‐wide collection of safflower. Crop Science, 2014, 54: 2109-2119 CrossRef
  3. Sabaghnia N., Yousefzadeh S., Janmohammadi M. Graphical evaluation of genetic diversity among some genotypes of Lepidium sativum L. using morphological traits. Taxonomy and Biosystematics, 2023, 15: 43-54 CrossRef
  4. Emongor V.E., Emongor R.A. Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). In: Neglected and Underutilized Crops. Academic Press, 2023: 683-731 CrossRef
  5. FAOSTAT. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, 2022. Available: http://faostat.fao.org. Accessed: 26.06.2024.
  6. Biradar S.S., Patil M.K., Naik V.R., Mukta N., Nayidu N.K., Desai S.A. Safflower improvement: conventional breeding and biotechnological approach. In: Accelerated plant breeding, Volume 4: Oil crops. Springer, 2022: 279-312 CrossRef
  7. Hassani S.M.R., Talebi R., Pourdad S.S., Naji A.M., Fayaz F. Morphological description, genetic diversity and population structure of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) mini core collection using SRAP and SSR markers. Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment, 2020, 34: 1043-1055 CrossRef
  8. Neelima S., Prabhakar K., Ramanamma K.V. Genetic variability, heritability, association and divergence studies in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) genotypes. Journal of Oilseeds Research,2021, 38: 265-269 CrossRef
  9. Bahmankar M., Nabati D.A., Dehdari M. Genetic relationships among Iranian and exotic safflower using microsatellite markers. Crop Science and Biotechnology, 2017, 20: 159-165 CrossRef
  10. Minnie C.M., Pushpavalli S., Sujatha K., Sandeep S., Sudhakar C., Rajeshwar R.E.D.D.Y., Rani C.S. Genetic analysis for yield and its attributes in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Journal of Oilseeds Research, 2020, 37: 253-259 CrossRef
  11. Lira J.P.E., Barelli M.A.A., da Silva V.P., Felipin-Azevedo R., dos Santos D.T., Galbiati C., Poletine J.P. Safflower genetic diversity based on agronomic characteristics in Mato Grosso state, Brazil, for a crop improvement program. Genetics and Molecular Research, 2021, 20: 1-12 CrossRef
  12. Rahimi M. Genetic diversity, population structure and screening of molecular markers associated to agronomic traits in Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Electrical Engineering, 2021, 45: 1549-1560 CrossRef
  13. Ebrahimi H., Sabaghnia N., Javanmard A., Abbasi A. Genotype by trait biplot analysis of trait relations in safflower. Agrotechniques in Industrial Crops, 2023, 3: 67-73 CrossRef
  14. Yan W., Frégeau-Reid J. Genotype by yield* trait (GYT) biplot: a novel approach for genotype selection based on multiple traits. Scientific Reports, 2018, 8: 8242 CrossRef
  15. Yan W. GGEbiplot — a Windows application for graphical analysis of multienvironment trial data and other types of two‐way data. Agronomy Journal, 2001, 93: 1111-1118 CrossRef
  16. Van Eeuwijk F.A., Bustos‐Korts D.V., Malosetti M. What should students in plant breeding know about the statistical aspects of genotype½environment interactions? Crop Science, 2016, 56: 2119-2140 CrossRef
  17. Anjani K. Components of seed yield in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2000, 70(12): 873-875.
  18. Janmohammadi M., Seifi A., Pasandi M., Sabaghnia N. The impact of organic manure and nano-inorganic fertilizers on the growth, yield and oil content of sunflowers under well-watered conditions. Biologija, 2016, 62: 227-241 CrossRef
  19. Fattahi M., Janmohammadi M., Abasi A., Sabaghnia N. The effects of farmyard manure and nitrogen fertilizer on the performance of safflower. Agrotechniques in Industrial Crops, 2023, 3: 162-169 CrossRef
  20. Cerrotta A., Lindström L.I., Echenique V. Selection tools for oil content and fatty acid composition in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Breeding Science, 2020, 70: 558-566 CrossRef
  21. Chapman M.A., Hvala J., Strever J., Burke J.M. Population genetic analysis of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius; Asteraceae) reveals a Near Eastern origin and five centers of diversity. American Journal of Botany, 2010, 97: 831-840 CrossRef
  22. Abou Chehade L., Angelini L.G., Tavarini S. Genotype and seasonal variation affect yield and oil quality of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) under Mediterranean conditions. Agronomy, 2022, 12: 122 CrossRef
  23. Dwivedi S.L., Ceccarelli S., Blair M.W., Upadhyaya H.D., Are A.K., Ortiz R. Landrace germplasm for improving yield and abiotic stress adaptation. Trends Plant Science,2016, 21: 31-42 CrossRef
  24. Baljani R., Shekari F., Sabaghnia N. Biplot analysis of trait relations of some safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) genotypes in Iran. Crop Research, 2015, 50: 63-73.
  25. Ali F., Yilmaz A., Chaudhary H.J., Nadeem M.A., Rabbani M.A., Arslan Y., Baloch F.S. Investigation of morphoagronomic performance and selection indices in the international safflower panel for breeding perspectives. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 2020, 44: 103-120 CrossRef
  26. Karahan T., Akgün I. Selection of barley (Hordeum vulgare) genotypes by GYT (genotype½yield½trait) biplot technique and its comparison with GT (genotype½trait). Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 2020, 18: 1347-1359 CrossRef

 

back

 


CONTENTS

 

Full article PDF (Rus)