doi: 10.15389/agrobiology.2023.3.473eng

UDC: 634.11+58.084.5

Supported financially by Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (agreement № 075-15-2022-321)



I.Yu. Savin1, 2 , S.N. Konovalov3, V.V. Bobkova3, D.V. Sharychev1

1Dokuchaev Soil Science Institute, Pyzhyovskii per. 7/str. 2, Moscow, 119017 Russia, e-mail (✉ corresponding author),;
2Institute of Environmental Engineering of RUDN, 8/2, ul. Miklukho-Maklaya, Moscow, 117198 Russia;
3Federal Horticultural Center for Breeding, Agrotechnology, and Nursery, 4, Zagoryevskaya ul., Moscow, 115598 Russia, e-mail

Savin I.Yu.
Bobkova V.V.
Konovalov S.N.
Sharychev D.V.

Final revision received January 31, 2022
Accepted February 01, 2023

Methods of operational remote (satellite and unmanned) agricultural monitoring are currently based on the use of spectral vegetation indices as some integral indicators of plant condition. Since the first of them (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index — NDVI) appeared in the early 1970’s, rich experience has been accumulated in their use to detect various properties of agricultural plants and agrophytocenoses as a whole. About a hundred different indices have been proposed to detect different properties, e.g., moisture, leaf structure, architecture of plants in crops, the content of various substances, including pigments regulating photosynthesis and plant productivity. In many cases, the proposed indices function reliably for specific plants or for the vegetation as a whole. For fruit crops and, in particular, for apple-tree, there are practically no such indices. In this paper, it is shown for the first time that the spectral vegetation indices proposed for the detection of pigments in agricultural plants need to be refined when they are used for similar detection of pigments in the leaves of an apple tree of a particular variety. Our goal was to analyze the relationship between the spectral vegetation indices calculated for the leaves of the Imrus apple tree (Malus domestica Borkh.) with the leaf content of chlorophyll and carotenoids. We evaluated the applicability of several dozen vegetation indices proposed for determining the content of chlorophylls and carotenoids in the leaves of various plants to the non-contact determination of these pigments in the leaves of the Imrus apple tree. On October 19, 2021, leaves were collected at noon randomly from 2-5-year old branches of the middle part of the crown of model Imrus trees grown from 2011 at the test plot (Stupino District, Moscow Province, Russia). In total, 26 mixed leaf samples were collected for pigment content analysis. The content of chlorophylls a + b was determined in the laboratory by the Wintermans-De Mots method, carotenoids by the von Wetshtein method. For the same leaves, spectral reflectance was measured under field conditions using a SR-6500 field spectroradiometer (Spectral Evolution, USA), which operates in the 350-2500 nm range with a resolution of 1 nm. Spectral reflectivity curves were plotted in 5 replicates for the upper surface of the leaves, averaged for each leaf, and then for each of the 26 mixed groups of leaves. Based on the averaged spectral reflectance curves, the most common spectral vegetation indices were calculated, followed by an analysis of the relationship between the values of the spectral vegetation indices and the content of pigments in the leaves. It has been established that the previously proposed numerous vegetation indices cannot be used for non-contact detection of the content of chlorophyll and carotenoids in the leaves of the Imrus apple tree. There is practically no connection between the index value and pigment content. It is also not possible to group the analyzed leaves according to the content of pigments based on the construction of a dendrogram of the similarity between the spectral reflectance curves of leaves in the range of 350-2500 nm. Based on the correction of the indices that showed the most accurate dependence, new vegetation indices were proposed for non-contact detection of the content of carotenoids and chlorophyll in apple leaves, which make it possible to obtain regression models with R2 above 0.65. Before widespread use, they must be tested for leaves of apple trees of other varieties, as well as for leaves at different stages of development.

Keywords: spectral reflectance, Malus domestica, apple leaves, chlorophyll content, carotenoids content, vegetation indexes.



  1. Ennouri K., Kallel A. Remote sensing: an advanced technique for crop condition assessment. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2019, 2019:9404565 CrossRef
  2. Tolpin V.A., Bartalev S.A., Efremov V.Yu., Lupyan E.A., Savin I.Yu., Flitman E.V. Sovremennye problemy distantsionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli iz kosmosa, 2010, 7(2): 221-232 (in Russ.).
  3. Savin I.Yu., Nègre T. Agro-meteorological monitoring in Russia and Central Asian countries. Ispra, OPOCE, 2006.
  4. Becker-Reshef I., Justice C., Sullivan M., Vermote E., Tucker C., Anyamba A., Small J., Pak E., Masuoka E., Schmaltz J., Hansen M., Pittman K., Birkett C., Williams D., Reynolds K., Doorn B. Monitoring global croplands with coarse resolution earth observations: the Global Agriculture Monitoring (GLAM) project. Remote Sensing, 2010, 2(6): 1589-1609 CrossRef
  5. Wu B., Meng J., Li Q., Yan N., Du X., Zhang M. Remote sensing-based global crop monitoring: experiences with China's CropWatch system. International Journal of Digital Earth, 2014, 7(2): 113-137 CrossRef
  6. Savin I. Crop yield prediction with SPOT VGT in Mediterranean and Central Asian countries. In: ISPRS Archives XXXVI-8/W48 Workshop proceedings: Remote sensing support to crop yield forecast and area estimates. Commission VIII, WG VIII/10. OPOCE, Stresa, 2007: 130-134.
  7. Rembold F., Atzberger C., Savin I., Rojas O. Using low resolution satellite imagery for yield prediction and yield anomaly detection. Remote Sensing, 2013, 5(4): 1704-1733 CrossRef
  8. Bereza O.V., Strashnaya A.I., Lupyan E.A. Sovremennye problemy distantsionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli iz kosmosa, 2015, 12(1): 18-30 (in Russ.).
  9. Savin I.Yu., Vernyuk Yu.I., Faraslis I. Byulleten’ Pochvennogo instituta im. V.V. Dokuchaeva, 2015, 80: 95-105 CrossRef (in Russ.).
  10. Vinogradov B.V. Aеrokosmicheskiy monitoring еkosistem [Aerospace monitoring of ecosystems]. Moscow, 1984 (in Russ.).
  11. Knizhnikov Yu.F., Kravtsova V.I., Tutubalina O.V. Aеrokosmicheskie metody geograficheskikh issledovaniy [Aerospace methods of geographical research]. Moscow, 2011 (in Russ.).
  12. Kriegler F.J., Malila W.A., Nalepka R.F., Richardson W. Preprocessing transformations and their effects on multispectral recognition. Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Remote Sensing of Environment, 1969: 97-131.
  13. Huang S., Tang L., Hupy J.P., Wang Y., Shao C. A commentary review on the use of normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) in the era of popular remote sensing. Journal of Forestry Research, 2021, 32: 1-6 CrossRef
  14. Nakalembe C., Becker-Reshef I., Bonifacio R., Hu G., Humber M.L., Justice C.J., Keniston J., Mwangi K., Rembold F., Shukla S., Urbano F., Whitcraft A.K., Li Y., Zappacosta M., Jarvis I., Sanchez A. A review of satellite-based global agricultural monitoring systems available for Africa. Global Food Security, 2021, 29: 100543 CrossRef
  15. Xue J., Su B. Significant remote sensing vegetation indices: a review of developments and applications. Journal of Sensors, 2017, 2017: 1353691 CrossRef
  16. Montero F. Photosynthetic pigments. In: Encyclopedia of astrobiology. M. Gargaud, R. Amils, J.C. Quintanilla, H.J.(J.) Cleaves, W.M. Irvine, D.L. Pinti, M. Viso (eds.). Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer CrossRef
  17. Kizeev A.N., Merzlyak M.N., Solovchenko A.E. Molodoy uchenyy, 2010, 6(17): 90-97 (in Russ.).
  18. Cui B., Zhao Q., Huang W., Song X., Ye H., Zhou X. A new integrated vegetation index for the estimation of winter wheat leaf chlorophyll content. Remote Sensing, 2019, 11(8): 974 CrossRef
  19. Cheng J., Yang G., Xu W., Feng H., Han S., Liu M., Zhao F., Zhu Y., Zhao Y., Wu B., Jang H. Improving the estimation of apple leaf photosynthetic pigment content using fractional derivatives and machine learning. Agronomy, 2022, 12(7): 1497 CrossRef
  20. Ta N., Chang Q., Zhang Y. Estimation of apple tree leaf chlorophyll content based on machine learning methods. Remote Sensing, 2021, 13(19): 3902 CrossRef
  21. Li C., Zhu X., Wei Y., Cao S., Guo X., Yu X., Chang C. Estimating apple tree canopy chlorophyll content based on Sentinel-2A remote sensing imaging. Sci. Rep., 2018, 8: 3756 CrossRef
  22. Wintermans J.E.G., De Mots A. Spectrophotometric characteristics of chlorophyll a and b and their phaeophytins in ethanol. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1965, 109(2): 448-453 CrossRef
  23. von Wettstein D. Chlorophyll-letale und der submikroskopische Formwechsel der Plastiden. Experimental Cell Research, 1957, 12(3): 427-506 CrossRef
  24. Gitelson A., Kaufman Y., Stark R., Rundquist D. Novel algorithms for remote estimation of vegetation fraction. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2002, 80(1): 76-87 CrossRef
  25. Blackburn G.A. Quantifying chlorophylls and carotenoids at leaf and canopy scales: an evaluation of some hyperspectral approaches. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1998, 66(3): 273-285 CrossRef
  26. Peñuelas J., Filella I. Visible and near-infrared reflectance techniques for diagnosing plant physiological status. Trends in Plant Science, 1998, 3(4): 151-156 CrossRef
  27. Carter G.A. Ratios of leaf reflectances in narrow wavebands as indicators of plant stress. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 1994, 15(3): 517-520 CrossRef
  28. Zarco-Tejada P.J., Ustin S.L., Whiting M.L. Temporal and spatial relationships between within‐field yield variability in cotton and high‐spatial hyperspectral remote sensing imagery. Agronomy Journal, 2005, 97(3): 641-653 CrossRef
  29. Gitelson A.A., Merzlyak M.N. Remote estimation of chlorophyll content in higher plant leaves. Advances in Space Research, 1998, 22(5): 689-692 CrossRef
  30. Datt B. Remote sensing of chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, chlorophyll a+b, and total carotenoid content in eucalyptus leaves. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1998, 66(2): 111-121 CrossRef
  31. Daughtry C.S.T., Walthall C.L., Kim M.S., Brown de Colstoun E., McMurtrey J.E. Estimating corn leaf chlorophyll concentration from leaf and canopy reflectance. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2000, 74(2): 229-239 CrossRef
  32. Barnes J.D., Balaguer L., Manrique E., Elvira S., Davison A.W. A reappraisal of the use of DMSO for the extraction and determination of chlorophylls a and b in lichens and higher plants. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 1992, 32(2): 85-100 CrossRef
  33. Gamon J.A., Peñuelas J., Field C.B. A narrow-waveband spectral index that tracks diurnal changes in photosynthetic efficiency. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1992, 41(1): 35-44 CrossRef
  34. Sims D.A., Gamon J.A. Relationships between leaf pigment content and spectral reflectance across a wide range of species, leaf structures and developmental stages. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2002, 81(2-3): 337-354 CrossRef
  35. Haboudane D., Miller J.R., Tremblay N., Zarco-Tejada P.J., Dextraze L. Integrated narrow-band vegetation indices for prediction of crop chlorophyll content for application to precision agriculture. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2002, 81(2-3): 416-426 CrossRef
  36. Broge N.H., Leblanc E. Comparing prediction power and stability of broadband and hyperspectral vegetation indices for estimation of green leaf area index and canopy chlorophyll density. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2000, 76(2): 156-172 CrossRef
  37. Vogelmann J.E., Rock B.N., Moss D.M. Red edge spectral measurements from sugar maple leaves, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 1993, 14(8): 1563-1575 CrossRef
  38. Zarco-Tejada P.J., Miller J.R., Noland T.L., Mohammad G.H., Sampson P.H. Scaling-up and model inversion methods with narrow band optical indices for chlorophyll content estimation in closed forest canopies with hyper spectral data. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 2001, 39(7): 1491-1507 CrossRef
  39. Datt B. A new reflectance index for remote sensing of chlorophyll content in higher plants: tests using eucalyptus leaves. Journal of Plant Physiology, 1999, 154(1): 30-36 CrossRef







Full article PDF (Rus)