doi: 10.15389/agrobiology.2014.3.49eng
UDC 633.72+634.3+635.9]:576.7.086.83:58
PROPAGATION in vitro OF SUBTROPICAL, ORNAMENTAL CROPS AND ENDEMIC SPECIES OF WESTERN CAUCASUS: DEVELOPED AND IMPROVED PROTOCOLS
T.M. Kolomiets, V.I. Malyarovskaya, M.V. Gvasaliya, L.S. Samarina, R.N. Sokolov
All-Russian Research Institute of Floriculture and Subtropical Crops, Russian Academy of Agricultural Sciences,
2/28, ul. Yana Fabriciusa, Sochi, 354002 Russia,
e-mail gvasaliya_aa@mail.ru
Received March 24, 2014
To obtain good planting material in floriculture and horticulture, the effective procedures are required for testing and sanitation. Micropropagation is also commonly known as an approach to intensifying plant breeding due to accelerated reproduction of valuable forms and as a way to save biodiversity of rare species. Nevertheless, for many flowering plants, and subtropical fruit crops and endemic species especially, the reliable protocols for in vitro cultivation, regeneration and propagation are not yet reported. This paper presents the results of a revised protocol application and the improvement of clonal micropropagation methods for tea Camellia sinensis (L.) Kuntze, lemon Citrus limon (L.)Burm, blossoming shrub Camellia japonica L., and Lilium caucasicum Miscz. ex Grossh., an endangered endemic species in the Western Caucasus. Some peculiarities in obtaining sterile culture are revealed, and the types of explants and seasonal terms of their introduction to in vitro culture are identified. Nutrient mediums and conditions for clonal micropropagation are optimized. Thus, cultivation of tea explants on WPM supplemented with phytohormones (i.e. 6-BAP at 3.0 mg/l and adenine at 0.9 mg/l) facilitated the induction of numerous adventitious microshoots. Aactive growth of C. japonica microshoots was also observed on the WPM medium with 6-BAP at 2 mg/l and indole-3-acetiс acid at 0.5 mg/l. In lemon cultivars, microengrafting is approved as a reliable propagation method. It was revealed that after the third cycle of microengrafting the multiplication index for microstalstalks was 2 times higher comparing to that for microshoots from auxiliary buds of donor plants, and made up 4.6 pc. per shoot. The results of in vitro cultivation of the various parts of Lilium caucasicum bulb scales showed that the induction of morphogenesis was not the same. After 48 days in vitro cultivation under sterile conditions, from the basal and medial scale parts the adventitious shoots were mainly developing, whereas callus- and rhizogenesis occurred rarely, while in the apical scale parts the callus formation dominated. In special publications there are no data on L. caucasicum cell and tissue in vitro cultivation. So, the protocol for in vitro cultivation and propagation of this endangered endemic species of the Western Caucasus is reported here for the first time.
Keywords: speed sterilization, clonal micropropagation, microshoots, microengrafting, tea Camellia sinensis (L.) Kuntze, lemon Citrus limon (L.) Burm, Camellia japonica L., Lilium caucasicum Miscz. ex Grossh.
REFERENCES
1. Vysotskii V.A. Biotekhnologicheskie metody v sisteme proizvodstva ozdorovlennogo posadochnogo materiala i selektsii plodovykh i yagodnykh rastenii. Doktorskaya dissertatsiya [Biotechnological methods in production of improved planting material, and fruit and berry plant breeding. DSc Thesis]. Moscow, 1997.
2. Krasnaya kniga Rossiiskoi Federatsii (rasteniya i griby) [Red Book of the Russian Federation (plants and fungi)]. Moscow, 2008.
3. Krasnaya kniga Krasnodarskogo kraya. Rasteniya i griby [Red Book of Krasnodarskii krai. Plants and fungi]. Krasnodar, 2007.
4. Citrus genetics, breeding and biotechnology /I.A. Khan (ed.). CAB International, UK, 2008.
5. Perez-Tornero C.I. An efficient protocol for micropropagation of lemon (Citrus limon) from mature nodal segments. Plant Cell Tiss. Organ Cult., 2010, 100: 263-271. CrossRef
6. Gvasaliya M.V. V sbornike nauchnykh trudov: Subtropicheskoe i dekorativnoe sadovodstvo [In: Subtropical and landscape gardening. Issue 46]. Sochi, 2012, vypusk 46: 133-137.
7. Iddagoda N., Kataeva N.V., Butenko R.G. Sel’skokhozyaistvennaya Biologiya [Agricultural Biology], 1990, 5: 98-104.
8. GvasaliyaM.V. Sadovodstvo i vinogradarstvo, 2013, 4: 20-22.
9. Gvasaliya M.V. Materialy Mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii «Dendrologiya, tsvetovodstvo i sadovo-parkovoe stroitel'stvo» [Proc. Int. Conf. «Dendrology, Floriculture, and Garden and Park Constructing». V. 2]. Yalta, 2012, tom 2: 93.
10. FAO Citrus Fruit Production. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations, FAOSTAT, 2009 (http://faostat.fao.org).
11. Globa-Mikhailenko I.D. Subtropicheskie kul'tury, 1980, 3: 32-35.
12. Butenko R.G., Shengeliya L.N. V sbornike: Kul'tura kletok rastenii i biotekhnologiya [Plant cell culture and biotechnology]. Moscow, 1986: 110-113.
13. Globa-Mikhailenko I.D., Khusaini S. Tezisy dokladov Vsesoyuznoi konferentsii molodykh uchenykh i aspirantov [Proc. Conf. of Young Scientists and Graduate Students of the USSR]. Tbilisi, 1987: 131.
14. Rathore J.S. Micropropagation of mature tree of Citrus limon. Ind. J. Biotechnol., 2007, 6: 239-244.
15. Saini H.K. Direct shoot organogenesis and plant regeneration in rough lemon (Citrus jambiri Lush.) Gill. Ind. J. Biotechnol., 2010, 9: 419-423.
16. Singh S. Citrus biotechnology: Achievements, limitations and future directions. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants., 2009, 15(1): 3-22. CrossRef
17. Karpun Yu.N. Subtropicheskaya dekorativnaya dendrologiya [Subtropical landscape dendrology]. St. Petersburg, 2010.
18. Edison S., Unnikrishnan M., Vimala B., Santha V. Biodiversity of tropical tuber crops in India. National Biodiversity Authority, Chennai, Tami Nadu, India, 2006.
19. Reed B., Sarasan M., Kane V. Biodiversity conservation and conservation biotechnology tools. In vitro Cell Dev. Biol. — Plant, 2011, 47: 1-4. CrossRef
20. Barnicoat H., Cripps R., Kendon J., Sarasan V. Conservation in vitro of rare and threatened ferns — case studies of biodiversity hotspot and island species. In vitro Cell Dev. Biol. — Plant, 2011, 47: 37-45. CrossRef
21. Marriott P., Sarasan V. Novel micropropagation and weaning methods for the integrated conservation of a critically endangered tree species, Medusagyne oppositifolia. In vitro Cell Dev. Biol. — Plant, 2010, 46: 516-523. CrossRef
22. Sarasan V. Importance of in vitro technology to future conservation programmes worldwide. Kew Bulletin, 2010, 65: 549-554. CrossRef
23. Sarasan V., Kite G., Sileshi C. Applications of phytochemical and in vitro techniques for reducing over-harvesting of medicinal and pesticidal plants and generating income for the rural poor. Plant Cell Rep., 2011, 30: 1163-1172. CrossRef
24. Coates D.J., Dixon K.W. Current perspectives in plant conservation biology. Austral. J. Bot., 2007, 55(3): 187-193. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/BT07037
25. Evsyukova T.V., Kolomiets T.M. V sbornike: Nauchnye osnovy razvitiya tsvetovodstva Rossii i proektirovanie sadovykh landshaftov [Scientific bases for floriculture development in Russia and garden landscape design]. Moscow, 2006: 94-97.
26. Tibilov A.A. Metodicheskie rekomendatsii po klonal'nomu mikrorazmnozheniyu shafrana prekrasnogo v kul'ture in vitro [In vitro clonal micropropagation of Crocus speciosus]. Moscow, 2003.
27. Sokolov R.N., Kolomiets T.M., Malyarovskaya V.I. Politematicheskii setevoi elektronnyi nauchnyi zhurnal Kubanskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta, 2013, 10(094) (http://ej.kubagro.ru/2013/10/pdf/13.pdf).
28. Murashige T., Skoog F. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco cultures. Physiologia Plantarum, 1962, 15: 473-497.
29. Gamborg O.G., Eveleigh D.E. Culture methods and detection of glucanases in cultures of wheat and barley. Canad. J. Biochem., 1968, 46(5): 417-421. CrossRef
30. Lloyd G., McCown B.H. Commercially feasible micropropagation of mountain laurel (Kalmia latifolia) by use of shoot tip culture. Combined Proceedings, Int. Plant Propagators Society USA, 1980, 30: 421-427.
31. Navarro L. Citrus shoot-tip grafting in vitro and its application: a review. Proc. Int. Citriculture, 1981, 1: 452-456.
32. Dospekhov B.A. Metodika polevogo opyta [Methods of field trials]. Moscow, 1985.
33. Samarina L.S. Regeneration and micropropagation of lemon cultivars in vitro from nodal explants. Russian Agricultural Science, 2010, 36(6): 417-420. CrossRef
34. SamarinaL.S. Optimizatsiya priemov mikrorazmnozheniya i sokhraneniya limona in vitro. Avtoreferat kandidatskoi dissertatsii [Optimization of lemon micropropagation and in vitro conservation. PhD Thesis]. Moscow, 2013.
35. Driver J.A., Kuniyuki A.H. In vitro propagation of Paradox walnut rootstock. Hortscience, 1984, 19: 507-509.
36. Singh B., Sharma S., Rani G., Hallan V., Zaidi A.A., Virk G.S., Nagpal A. In vitro micrografting for the production of Indian citrus ringspot virus (ICRSV)-free plants of kinnow mandarin (Citrus nobilis Lour х C. deliciosa Tenora). Plant Biotechnol. Rep., 2008, 2: 137-143. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11816-008-0055-6
37. Malyarovskaya V.I. V sbornike nauchnykh trudov: Subtropicheskoe i dekorativnoe sadovodstvo [In: Subtropical and landscape gardening. Issue 47]. Sochi, 2012, vypusk 47: 161-168.
38. Malyarovskaya V.I. Materialy Mezhdunarodno inauchnoi konferentsii «Biologicheski aktivnye veshchestva rastenii — izuchenie i ispol'zovanie» [Proc. Int. Conf. «Bioactive Substances of Plants: Study and Use»]. Minsk, 2013: 140-141.
