PLANT BIOLOGY
ANIMAL BIOLOGY
SUBSCRIPTION
E-SUBSCRIPTION
 
MAP
MAIN PAGE

 

 

 

 

doi: 10.15389/agrobiology.2023.2.333eng

UDC: 636.3.035:57.017.53:619

Acknowledgements:
Supported financially from the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (theme 0445-2021-0004)

 

THE EFFECT OF HORMONAL STIMULATION SCHEME AND SEASON ON THE EFFICIENCY OF ESTRUS SYNCHRONIZATION IN ROMANOV EWES (Ovis aries L.)

V.A. Lukanina , R.Yu. Chinarov, G.N. Singina

Ernst Federal Research Center for Animal Husbandry, 60, pos. Dubrovitsy, Podolsk District, Moscow Province, 142132 Russia, e-mail kristybatle@gmail.com ( ✉ corresponding author), roman_chinarov@mail.ru, g_singina@mail.ru

ORCID:
Lukanina V.A. orcid.org/0000-0003-4744-7873
Singina G.N. orcid.org/0000-0003-0198-9757
Chinarov R.Yu. orcid.org/0000-0001-6511-5341

Final revision received January 27, 2023
Accepted March 20, 2023

Estrus synchronization in sheep is an important element in the organization of reproductive programs, including those based on assisted reproductive technologies. The diversity of sheep breeds, the differences in environmental conditions of breeding zones and the specificities in hormonal status of animals not allow the finding a universal protocol for the management of reproductive cycles. The aim of our work was to identify the conditions of estrus synchronization in Romanov ewes in different seasons of the year. For the first time, a comparative analysis of two schemes of hormonal stimulation of estrus was carried out, involving either two consecutive injections of prostaglandin F2a (Scheme 1), or initially injection of gonadotropin releasing hormone followed by prostaglandin F2a treatment (Scheme 2). The study was carried out on mature Romanov ewes (n = 160). The first group (n = 121) underwent hormonal treatment using the Scheme 1, with two injections of cloprostenol (125 μg per injection) 13 and 2 days before the expected day of estrus (day 0). In the second group of animals (n = 39), the Scheme 2 was used, which included injections of 15 μg of lyuliberin acetate and 125 μg of cloprostenol at days 9 and 2 before expected day of estrus, respectively. In the first group, the results of estrus synchronization were analyzed by seasons, the autumn—winter period (n = 73) and spring—summer period (n = 48). For detail analysis, the data were studied by two-month periods: Sept-Oct (n = 24), Nov-Dec (n = 26), Jan-Feb (n = 23), Mar-Apr (n = 32), and May-June (n = 16). The efficiency of hormonal treatment was evaluated in all experimental animals based on appearance of estrus in 24 and 48 hours after the last injection. In some of the animals that showed estrus response (n = 80), visual assessment of the ovaries for the presence of corpora luteum (CL) was performed using laparotomy or laparoscopy 96 hours after estrus detection. The variance analysis showed a reliable effect of the hormonal treatment scheme (F = 5.21, p = 0.024) as well as the season (F = 13.82, p = 0.0003) on the estrus response. The average number of CL was subjected to greater variability by the year of experimental studies (p ≤ 0.05) and the season (p ≤ 0.01), without significant effect of the treatment scheme. Using the Scheme 1 revealed the trend of higher estrus response comparing to Scheme 2, 80.17 % vs 66.67 %. Along with that, in the second group the CL were found in all ewes with the estrus signs, while in the first group the CL were found in 90.77 % of animals (p £ 0.05). Synchronization results for ewes in the autumn-winter period were better than in the spring-summer period: the estrus response was 92.50 % compared to 64.58 % (p £ 0.01), the average number of CL for ewes in the estrus stage was 2.02 vs 1.28 (p £ 0.01), and the average number of CL in ewes with identified CL was 2.18 vs 1.62 (p £ 0.05). A more detailed analysis by the two-month periods showed that the values of the above-mentioned indices were relatively stable during the autumn-winter period, after which they decreased in Mar-Apr and reached minimum values in May-June. Thus, for stimulating the estrus in Romanov ewes we recommend two consecutive injections of cloprostenol (13 and 2 days before the expected estrus). The efficiency of the method is higher in autumn-winter season, after which a decrease occurs in the response of animals to hormonal treatment.

Keywords: ewes, Romanov breed, hormones, prostaglandin F2a, estrus stimulation, ovarian function.  

 

REFERENCES

  1. Aybazov A.-M.M., Mamontova T., Kovalenko D., Gubakhanov M. Sel’skokhpzyaistvennyi zhurnal, 2021, 14(1): 2687-1246 CrossRef
  2. Wei S., Chen S., Wei B., Liu Z., Bai T., Lin J. Estrus synchronization schemes and application efficacies in anestrus lanzhou fat-tailed ewes, Journal of Applied Animal Research, 2016, 44: 466-73 CrossRef
  3. Garoussi M.T., Mavadati O., Bahonar M., Ragh M.J. The effect of medroxyprogesterone acetate with or without eCG on conception rate of fat-tail ewes in out of breeding season. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 2020, 52(4): 1617-1622 CrossRef
  4. Hasani N., Ebrahimi M., Ghasemi-Panahi B., HosseinKhani A. Evaluating reproductive performance of three estrus synchronization protocols in Ghezel ewes. Theriogenology, 2018, 122: 9-13 CrossRef
  5. Rosasco S.L., Beard J.K., Hallford D.M., Summers A.F. Evaluation of estrous synchronization protocols on ewe reproductive efficiency and profitability. Animal Reproduction Science, 2019, 210: 106191 CrossRef
  6. Zinov’eva N.A., Pozyabin S.V., Chinarov R.Yu. Assisted reproductive technologies: the history and role in the development of genetic technologies in cattle (review). Sel'skokhozyaistvennayabiologiya[AgriculturalBiology], 2020, 55(2): 225-242 CrossRef
  7. Menchaca A., Dos Santos-Neto P.C., Cuadro F., Souza-Neves M., Crispo M. From reproductive technologies to genome editing in small ruminants: an embryo's journey. Animal Reproduction, 2018, 15(Suppl. 1): 984-995 CrossRef
  8. Li H., Wang G., Hao Z., Zhang G., Qing Y., Liu S., Qing L., Pan W., Chen L, Liu G., Zhao R., Jia B., Zeng L., Guo J., Zhao L., Zhao H., Lv C., Xu K., Cheng W., Li H., Zhao H.Y., Wang W., Wei H.J. Generation of biallelic knock-out sheep via gene-editing and somatic cell nuclear transfer. Scientific Reports, 2016, 6: 33675 CrossRef
  9. Paramio M.T., Izquierdo D. Recent advances in in vitro embryo production in small ruminants. Theriogenology, 2016, 86(1): 152-159 CrossRef
  10. Ungerfeld R., Ramos M.A., González-Pensado S.P. Ram effect: adult rams induce a greater reproductive response in anestrous ewes than yearling rams. Animal Reproduction Science, 2008, 103(3-4): 271-277 CrossRef
  11. Pellicer-Rubio M.T., Leboeuf B., Bernelas D., Forgerit Y., Pougnard J.L., Bonné J.L., Senty E., Breton S., Brun F., Chemineau P. High fertility using artificial insemination during deep anoestrus after induction and synchronisation of ovulatory activity by the “male effect” in lactating goats subjected to treatment with artificial long days and progestogens. Animal Reproduction Science, 2008, 109(1-4): 172-188 CrossRef
  12. Lassoued N., Khaldi G., Cognié Y., Chemineau P., Thimonier J. Effet de la progestérone sur le taux d'ovulation et la durée du cycle ovarien induits par effet mâle chez la brebis Barbarine et la chèvre locale tunisienne [Effect of progesterone on ovulation length and duration of the ovarian cycle induced by the male effect in the Barbarine ewe and the local Tunisian goat]. Reproduction Nutrition Development, 1995, 35(4): 415-426 CrossRef
  13. Abecia J.A., Forcada F., González-Bulnes A. Hormonal control of reproduction in small ruminants. Animal Reproduction Science, 2012, 130(3-4): 173-179 CrossRef
  14. Habeeb H.M.H., Anne Kutzler M. Estrus synchronization in the sheep and goat. The Veterinary Clinics of North America. Food Animal Practice, 2021, 37(1): 125-137 CrossRef
  15. Yu X., Bai Y., Yang J., Zhao X., Zhang L., Wang J. Comparison of five protocols of estrous synchronization on reproductive performance of Hu sheep. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 2022, 9: 843514 CrossRef
  16. dos Santos-Neto P.C., García-Pintos C., Pinczak A., Menchaca A. Fertility obtained with different progestogen intravaginal devices using short-term protocol for fixed-time artificial insemination (FTAI) in sheep. Livestock Science, 2015, 182: 125-128 CrossRef
  17. Jordan K.M., Inskeep E.K., Knights M. Use of gonadotropin releasing hormone to improve reproductive responses of ewes introduced to rams during seasonal anestrus. Animal Reproduction Science, 2009, 116(3-4): 254-264 CrossRef
  18. Powell M.R., Kaps M., Lamberson W.R., Keisler D.H. Use of melengestrol acetate-based treatments to induce and synchronize estrus in seasonally anestrous ewes. Journal of Animal Science, 1996, 74(10): 2292-2302 CrossRef
  19. Harl A.W. Comparison of short-term vs. long-term estrous synchronization protocols using CIDR devices in sheep and goats during and outside the natural breeding season. KansasStateUniversity, 2014. Available: http://hdl.handle.net/2097/18288. Accessed 31.01.2023.
  20. Gonzalez E.C.G., Cruz U.M., Reyes L.A., Morales J.V.V., Perez R.V., Zuniga S, Ponce J.L. Parity of the Dorper sheep does not influence the reproductive and productive response when they are synchronized with an “ultra-short” protocol. Open Access Journal of Science, 2018, 2(3): 193-196 CrossRef
  21. Martinez-Ros P., Gonzalez-Bulnes A., Garcia-Rosello E., Rios-Abellan A., Astiz S. Effects of short-term intravaginal progestagen treatment on fertility and prolificacy after natural breeding in sheep at different reproductive seasons. Journal of Applied Animal Research, 2019, 47(1): 201-205 CrossRef
  22. Laliotis V., Vosniakou A., Zafrakas A., Lymberopoulos A., Alifakiotis T. The effect of melatonin on lambing and litter size in milking ewes after advancing the breeding season with progestagen and PMSG followed by artificial insemination. Small Ruminant Research, 1998, 31(1): 79-81 CrossRef
  23. Kridli R.T., Husein M.Q., Muhdi H.A., Al-Khazaleh J.M. Reproductive performance of hormonally-treated anestrous Awassi ewes. Animal Reproduction, 2006, 3(3): 347-352.
  24. Stellflug J.N., Rodriguez F., LaVoie V.A., Glimp H.A. Influence of simulated photoperiod alteration and induced estrus on reproductive performance of spring-born Columbia and Targhee ewe lambs. Journal of Animal Science, 1994, 72(1): 29-33 CrossRef
  25. Rutigliano H.M., Adams B.M., Jablonka-Shariff A., Boime I., Adams T.E. Effect of time and dose of recombinant follicle stimulating hormone agonist on the superovulatory response of sheep. Theriogenology, 2014, 82(3): 455-460 CrossRef
  26. Pampori A.Z., Ahmad Sheikh A., Aarif O., Hasin D., Ahmad Bhat I. Physiology of reproductive seasonality in sheep — an update. Biological Rhythm Research, 2020, 51(4): 586-598 CrossRef
  27. Mekuriaw Z., Assefa H., Tegegne A., Muluneh D. Estrus response and fertility of Menz and crossbred ewes to single prostaglandin injection protocol. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 2016, 48(1): 53-57 CrossRef

 

back

 


CONTENTS

 

 

Full article PDF (Rus)

Full article PDF (Eng)