PLANT BIOLOGY
ANIMAL BIOLOGY
SUBSCRIPTION
E-SUBSCRIPTION
 
MAP
MAIN PAGE

 

 

 

 

Pronin A.S., Kolmykova A.S. Lukatkin Co-culture of Pseudomonas T.S.chlororaphis and Saccharomyces cerevisiae to create a complex biological product. Sel'skokhozyaistvennaya Biologiya [Agricultural Biology], 2022, Vol. 57, № 1, p. 171-182.
(how to cite this article)

doi: 10.15389/agrobiology.2022.1.171eng

UDC: 579.64:57.083.13

 

CO-CULTURE OF Pseudomonas chlororaphis and Saccharomyces cerevisiae TO CREATE A COMPLEX BIOLOGICAL PRODUCT

A.S. Pronin1 ✉, T.S. Kolmykova2, A.S. Lukatkin1

1National Research Mordovia State University, 68, ul. Bolshevistskaya, Saransk, 430005 Russia, e-mail proninbio@gmail.com (✉ corresponding author), aslukatkin@yandex.ru;
2Lyceum No. 31, 2, ul. Metallurgov, Saransk, 430034 Russia, e-mail: tskolmykova@yandex.ru

ORCID:
Pronin A.S. orсid.org/0000-0001-5196-9418
Lukatkin A.S. orсid.org/0000-0002-8174-5367
Kolmykova T.S. orсid.org/0000-0002-0581-8288

November 24, 2021

 

Currently, there has been a trend in agriculture towards an increase in the use of biological preparations, including plant protection means. Developments are actively underway to create and optimize technologies for the production of new biological preparations that contain plant growth stimulating lines of bacteria (Plant Growth Promoting Bacteria, PGPB) or fungi (Plant Growth Promoting Fungi, PGPF). Fungi and bacteria co-inhabit the rhizosphere of higher plants and fungal-bacterial interactions permanently occur. In recent years, biological preparations based on bacteria and fungi (insecticide Biostop, fungicide Sporobacterin) have entered the agrochemical and pesticide market. However, special requirements of bacteria and fungi for nutrient media, aeration, and culture regimes imped production of combined bacterial-fungal biologicals. In this work, we have established for the first time the positive effect of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Y-4317 on the growth of Pseudomonas chlororaphis subsp. auerofaciens B-5326 and revealed the optimal regimes and the composition of the nutrient medium for co-culture of microorganisms of different taxonomic groups (PGPB and PGPF). The high efficiency of using sugar beet molasses for co-culture of P. chlororaphis and S. cerevisiae has been shown. Our findings revealed the stimulating effect of the liquid culture (LC) on the seed germination energy and germination rate of cereals. The aim of this work was to develop a protocol for co-culture of bacteria Pseudomonas chlororaphis subsp. auerofaciens B-5326 and yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae Y-4317 to create a biological preparation stimulating seed germination and initial growth of cereal plants. Lyophilized strains P. chlororaphis and S. cerevisiae were obtained from the All-Russian Collection of Industrial Microorganisms of the National Research Center Kurchatov Institute — GosNIIgenetica (Moscow). Seeds of maize (Zea mays L.) hybrid Delitop, wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) variety Mironovskaya 808, barley (Нordeum vulgare L.) variety Scepter served for testing bioactivity of the biological. After restoring viability, the strains were cultured for 48 hours on a shaker SPH-2102 (BIORUS, Belarus) using three nutrient media differing in the carbon source (glucose, fructose, and sugar beet molasses). Microbial growth (colony-forming units, CFU) and biomass were assessed during co-culture (from 0 to 72 h) on the shaker and in a lab fermenter BIORUS GJ (BIORUS, Belarus) at different temperatures (from 20 to 32 °С) and airflow rates (from 1 to 6 L/h). The seeds were treated by spraying with 1:200-1:25 serial dilutions of the liquid co-culture. After 12 h, the seeds were placed into Petri dishes with water. The germination energy and seed germination rate were determined in 3 and 7 days, respectively. The research data showed that media containing sugar beet molasses completely satisfies the need of co-cultured P. chlororaphis and S. cerevisiae for basic nutrients, and the titers did not fall below 6×108 and 3×106CFU/ml, respectively. The total biomass was 20.4 g/l, or 17-22 % higher than on the media with glucose or fructose. For co-culture, the optimal conditions were 30°C, aeration mode 4 l/h and 24 h of growth. A positive effect of S. cerevisiae on the viability of P. chlororaphis during 72 h co-culture was demonstrated. The abundance of P. chlororaphis in the co-culture with S. cerevisiae was 1×106 CFU/ml vs. 5×104 CFU/ml in pure culture of P. chlororaphis. Probably, a higher viability of P. chlororaphis and stimulation of its growth is due to phytohormones produced by S. cerevisiae during co-culture. Preliminary testing revealed stimulating effect of the biological on the germination energy and seed germination rate for barley, wheat and corn. All serial dilutions of the liquid co-culture exhibited a clear trend towards an increase in seed germination in the cereals tested. The maize seed germination was most stimulated. A 1:200 dilution of the biological led to the maximum increase in seed germination of the crops. Our research data identify the key parameters of the co-culture of PGPB P. chlororaphis and PGPF S. cerevisiae and thereby create the prerequisites for the development of a biological based on microorganisms of vadifferent taxonomic groups.

Keywords: Pseudomonas chlororaphis, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, biological preparation, biomass, culture procedure, maize, wheat, barley, seed germination.  

 

REFERENCES

  1. Kocira S., Hara P., Szparaga A., Czerwińska E., Beloev H., Findura P., Bajus P. Evaluation of the effectiveness of the use of biopreparations as seed dressings. Agriculture, 2020, 10(4): 90 CrossRef
  2. Yadav A.N., Verma P., Singh B., Chauhan V.S., Suman A., Saxena A.K. Plant growth promoting bacteria: Biodiversity and multifunctional attributes for sustainable agriculture. Advances in Biotechnology & Microbiology, 2017, 5(5): 555671 CrossRef
  3. El-Maraghy S.S., Tohamy A.T., Hussein K.A. Plant protection properties of the plant growth-promoting fungi (PGPF): Mechanisms and potentiality. Current Research in Environmental & Applied Mycology (Journal of Fungal Biology),2021, 11: 391-415 CrossRef
  4. Kumar A., Singh S., Gaurav A.K., Srivastava S., Verma J.P. Plant growth-promoting bacteria: Biological tools for the mitigation of salinity stress in plants. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2020, 11: 1216 CrossRef
  5. Burova Yu.A., Ibragimova S.A., Revin V.V. Izvestiya Tul'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Estestvennyenauki, 2012, 3: 198-206 (in Russ.).
  6. Babenko L.M., Romanenko E.A., Yungin, O.S., Kosakovskaya I.V. Acyl-homoserine lactones for crop production and stress tolerance of agricultural plants (review). Sel'skokhozyaistvennaya biologiya [Agricultural Biology], 2021, 56(1): 3-19 CrossRef
  7. Bertani I., Zampieri E., Bez C., Volante A., Venturi V., Monaco S. Isolation and characterization of Pseudomonas chlororaphis strain ST9 and its potential as a bioinoculant for agriculture. BioRxiv, 2020, 10(7): 1466 CrossRef
  8. Jiménez J.A, Novinscak A., Filion M. Inoculation with the plant-growth-promoting rhizo-bacterium Pseudomonas fluorescens LBUM677 impacts the rhizosphere microbiome of three oilseed crops. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2020, 11: 569366 CrossRef
  9. Zhang Y., Li T., Xu M., Guo J., Zhang C., Feng Z., Peng X., Li Z., Xing K., Qin S. Antifungal effect of volatile organic compounds produced by Pseudomonas chlororaphis subsp. aureofaciens SPS-41 on oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction of Ceratocystis fimbriata. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, 2021, 173: 104777 CrossRef
  10. Salim H.A., Aziz A.K., Mahdi M.H., Ali M.A.K., Salman M.H., Hussein M.M., Mohammed L.K., Ahmed M.S., Khalil A.Y., Hadi T.A. Effect of bio-fertilizers Azotobacter chroococcum and Pseudomonas fluorescens on growth of broccoli (Brassica oleracea L. var. italica). Journal of Advances in Biology, 2018, 11(01): 2236-2240 CrossRef
  11. Martínez-Carranza E., Ponce-Soto G.-Y., Servín-González L., Alcaraz L.D., Soberón-Chávez G. Evolution of bacteria seen through their essential genes: the case of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Azotobacter vinelandii. Microbiology, 2019, 165(9): 976-984 CrossRef
  12. Cidorenko M.L., Sleptsova N.A., Bykovskaya A.N., Berezhnaya V.V., Klykov A.G. Effects of nitrogen-fixing and phosphate-solubilizing microorganisms from the Far East agricultural soils on the cereal seed germination. Sel'skokhozyaistvennaya biologiya [Agricultural Biology], 2021, 56(1): 146-157 CrossRef
  13. Naserzadeh Y., Nafchi A.M., Mahmoudi N., Nejad D.K., Gadzhikurbanov A.S. Effect of combined use of fertilizer and plant growth stimulating bacteria Rhizobium, Azospirillum, Azotobacter and Pseudomonas on the quality and components of corn forage in Iran. RUDN Journal of Agronomy and Animal Industries, 2019, 14(3): 209-224 CrossRef
  14. Ali S., Hameed S., Shahid M., Iqbal M., Lazarovits G., Imran A. Functional characterization of potential PGPR exhibiting broad-spectrum antifungal activity. Microbiological Research, 2020, 232: 126389 CrossRef
  15. Streletskii R.A., Kachalkin A.V., Glushakova A.M., Demin V.V., Chernov I.Y. Quantitative determination of indole-3-acetic acid in yeasts using high performance liquid chromatography—tandem mass spectrometry. Microbiology, 2016, 85: 727-736 CrossRef
  16. Lukatkin A.S., Zauralov O.A. Doklady Rossel'khozakademii, 2009, 6: 20-22 (in Russ.).
  17. Kolmykova T.S., Lukatkin A.S. Agrokhimiya, 2012, 1: 83-94 (in Russ.).
  18. Gruznova K.A., Bashmakov D.I., Miliauskienė J., Vaštakaitė V., Duchovskis P., Lukatkin A.S. The effect of a growth regulator Ribav-Extra on winter wheat seedlings exposed to heavy metals Zemdirbyste-Agriculture, 2018, 105(3): 227-234 CrossRef
  19. Yamagiwa Y., Inagaki Y., Ichinose Y., Toyoda K., Hyakumachi M., ShiraishiT. Talaromyces wortmannii FS2 emits β-caryphyllene, which promotes plant growth and induces resistance. Journal of General Plant Pathology, 2011, 77(6): 336-341 CrossRef
  20. Bhattacharyya P.N., Jha D.K. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): emergence in agriculture. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2012, 28(4): 1327-1350 CrossRef
  21. Khan A.L., Waqas M., Lee I.-J. Resilience of Penicillium resedanum LK6 and exogenous gibberellin in improving Capsicum annuum growth under abiotic stresses. Journal of Plant Research, 2015, 128(2): 259-268 CrossRef
  22. Tian P., Razavi B.S., Zhang X., Wang Q., Blagodatskaya E. Microbial growth and enzyme kinetics in rhizosphere hotspots are modulated by soil organics and nutrient availability. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2020, 141: 107662 CrossRef
  23. Ozimek E., Hanaka A. Mortierella species as the plant growth-promoting fungi present in the agricultural soils. Agriculture, 2021, 11(1): 7 CrossRef
  24. Taparia T., Krijger M., Haynes E., Elphinstone J.G., Noble R., van der Wolf J. Molecular characterization of Pseudomonas from Agaricus bisporus caps reveal novel blotch pathogens in Western Europe. BMC Genomics, 2020, 21(1): 505 CrossRef
  25. Spravochnik pestitsidov i agrokhimikatov, razreshennykh k primeneniyu na territorii Rossiiskoi Federatsii[Directory of pesticides and agrochemicals permitted for use on the territory of the Russian Federation]. Moscow, 2011 (in Russ.).
  26. Jacob F.F., Striegel L., Rychlik M., Hutzler M., Methner F.-J. Spent yeast from brewing processes: a biodiverse starting material for yeast extract production. Fermentation, 2019, 5(2): 51 CrossRef
  27. Anderson A.J., Kim Y.C. Insights into plant-beneficial traits of probiotic Pseudomonas chlororaphis isolates. Journal of Medical Microbiology,2020, 69(3): 361-371 CrossRef
  28. Netrusov A.I., Egorova M.A., ZakharchukL.M. Praktikum po mikrobiologii/Pod redaktsiei A.I. Netrusova [Workshop on microbiology. A.I. Netrusov (ed.)]. Moscow, 2005 (in Russ.).
  29. Casalone E., Barberio C., Cappellini L., Polsinelli M. Characterization of Saccharomyces cerevisiae natural populations for pseudohyphal growth and colony morphology. Research in Microbiology, 2005, 156(2): 191-200 CrossRef
  30. Kasana R.C., Sharma U.K., Sharma N., Sinha A.K. Isolation and identification of a novel strain of Pseudomonas chlororaphis capable of transforming isoeugenol to vanillin. Current Microbiology, 2007, 54(6): 457-461 CrossRef
  31. Jain R., Pandey A. A phenazine-1-carboxylic acid producing polyextremophilic Pseudomonas chlororaphis (MCC2693) strain, isolated from mountain ecosystem, possesses biocontrol and plant growth promotion abilities. MicrobiologicalResearch, 2016, 190: 63-71 CrossRef
  32. GOST 12038-84. Semena sel'skokhozyaistvennykh kul'tur. Metody opredeleniya vskhozhesti [GOST 12038-84. Seeds of agricultural crops. Germination methods]. Moscow, 2004 (in Russ.).
  33. Lakin G.F. Biometriya [Biometrics]. Moscow, 1990 (in Russ.).
  34. Šarić L.Ć., Filipčev B.V., Šimurina O.D., Plavšić D.V., Šarić B.M., Lazarević J.M., Milovanović I.L. Sugar beet molasses: properties and applications in osmotic dehydration of fruits and vegetables. Food and Feed Research, 2016, 43(2): 135-144 CrossRef
  35. Kim H.-S., Cha E., Kim Y., Jeon Y.H., Olson B.H., Byun Y., Park H.-D. Raffinose, a plant galactoside, inhibits Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm formation via binding to LecA and decreasing cellular cyclic diguanylate levels. Scientific Reports, 2016, 6(1): 25318 CrossRef
  36. Kuriyama H., Kobayashi H. Effects of oxygen supply on yeast growth and metabolism in continuous fermentation. Journal of Fermentation and Bioengineering,1993, 75(5): 364-367 CrossRef
  37. Shen X., Wang Z., Huang X., Hu H., Wang W., Zhang X. Developing genome-reduced Pseudomonas chlororaphis strains for the production of secondary metabolites. BMC Genomics, 2017, 18: 715 CrossRef
  38. Moreno-Avitia F., Utrilla J., Bolívar F., Nogales J., Escalante A. Metabolic reconstruction of Pseudomonas chlororaphis ATCC 9446 to understand its metabolic potential as a phenazine-1-carboxamide-producing strain. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2020, 104(23): 10119-10132 CrossRef
  39. Romano J.D., Kolter R. Pseudomonas-Saccharomyces interactions: Influence of fungal metabolism on bacterial physiology and survival. Journal of Bacteriology, 2005, 187(3): 940-948 CrossRef
  40. Schleissner C., Reglero A., Luengo J.M. Catabolism of D-glucose by Pseudomonas putida occurs via extracellular transformation into D-gluconic acid and induction of a specific gluconate transport system. Microbiology, 1997, 143(5): 1595-1603 CrossRef
  41. Limtong S., Koowadjanakul N. Yeasts from phylloplane and their capability to produce indole-3-acetic acid. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2012, 28(12): 3323-3335 CrossRef
  42. Nutaratat P., Srisuk N., Arunrattiyakorn P., Limtong S. Plant growth-promoting traits of epiphytic and endophytic yeasts isolated from rice and sugar cane leaves in Thailand. Fungal Biology, 2014, 118(8): 683-694 CrossRef
  43. Pirog T.P., Iutynska G.O., Leonova N.O., Beregova K.A., Shevchuk T.A. Microbial synthesis of phytohormones. Biotechnologia Acta, 2018, 11(1): 5-24 CrossRef
  44. Streletskii R.A., Kachalkin A.V., Fedotov G.N. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya, 2017, 1: 130 (in Russ.).

 

back

 


CONTENTS

 

 

Full article PDF (Rus)

Full article PDF (Eng)